Comparison of Spiral Versus Lateral Plate Fixations in Treatment of Multiple Humeral Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12974/2313-0954.2023.09.01Keywords:
Multi-directional, Minimally invasive surgery, Plate fixations, Structural stabilityAbstract
Open reduction internal fixation technique has been generally accepted for treatment of complex humeral fractures. Traditional proximal humeral locking plate design (PHILOS) have been reported in clinical or biomechanical researches, while presently the spiral plate design has been introduced improved biomechanical behavior over conventional designs. In order to objectively realize the multi-directional biomechanical performances and minimally invasive surgery for humeral plate designs, a current conceptual finite element analysis has been conducted with identical cross-sectional features for humeral plates. The conceptual lateral, and spiral humeral plate models were constructed for virtual reduction and fixation to the multiple fractures of the humerus. Mechanical load cases including axial compression, counterclockwise torsion and anterior bending have been applied for confirming the multi-directional structural stability and implant safety in biomechanical perspective. Results revealed that the lateral humeral plate model showed lower equivalent (von-Mises) stress under counterclockwise torsion, while the spiral humeral plate model performed greater rigidity and lower equivalent (von-Mises) stress under other loading cases. Four models represented similar structural stiffness under bending load. Under the different mechanical load cases, the spiral humeral plate model revealed comparable results with acceptable multi-directional biomechanical behavior. The concept of spiral humeral plate design is worth considering in practical application in clinics. Implant safety and stability should be further investigated by evidences in future mechanical tests and clinical observations.
References
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury, 2006: 37(8): 691-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130
Sun Q, Wu X, Wang L, Cai M. The plate fixation strategy of complex proximal humeral fractures. Int Orthop. 2020 Sep; 44(9): 1785-1795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04544-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04544-7
Sears BW, Hatzidakis AM, Johnston PS. Intramedullary Fixation for Proximal Humeral Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 May 1; 28(9): e374-e383. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00360
Williams GR Jr, Wong KL. Two-part and three-part fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000 Jan; 31(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70124-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70124-3
Gönç U, Atabek M, Teker K, Tanriöver A. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with PHILOS plate for proximal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Jan; 51(1): 1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.10.003
Mischler D, Babu S, Osterhoff G, Pari C, Fletcher J, Windolf M, Gueorguiev B, Varga P. Comparison of optimal screw configurations in two locking plate systems for proximal humerus fixation - a finite element analysis study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2020 Aug; 78: 105097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105097
Updegrove GF, Mourad W, Abboud JA. Humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr; 27(4): e87-e97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.028
Zhao L, Yang P, Zhu L, Chen AM. Minimal invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) through deltoid- pectoralis approach for the treatment of elderly proximal humeral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 12; 18(1): 187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1538-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1538-9
Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Nov; 84(8): 1093-110. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.13752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84B8.0841093
Rancan M, Dietrich M, Lamdark T, Can U, Platz A. Minimal invasive long PHILOS®-plate osteosynthesis in metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus. Injury. 2010 Dec; 41(12): 1277-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.235
Fernández Dell'Oca AA. The principle of helical implants. Unusual ideas worth considering. Injury. 2002 Apr; 33 Suppl 1:SA1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00064-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00064-5
Krishna KR, Sridhar I, Ghista DN. Analysis of the helical plate for bone fracture fixation. Injury. 2008 Dec; 39(12): 1421-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.04.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.04.013
Partal G, Meyers KN, Sama N, Pagenkopf E, Lewis PB, Goldman A, Wright TM, Helfet DL. Superior versus anteroinferior plating of the clavicle revisited: a mechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jul; 24(7): 420-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c3f6d4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c3f6d4
Lin CL, Lin YH, Chen AC. Buttressing angle of the doubleplating fixation of a distal radius fracture: a finite element study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006 Aug; 44(8): 665-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0082-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0082-9
Duprey S, Bruyere K, Verriest JP. Human shoulder response to side impacts: a finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2007 Oct; 10(5): 361-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840701463986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840701463986
Oh JK, Sahu D, Ahn YH, Lee SJ, Tsutsumi S, Hwang JH, Jung DY, Perren SM, Oh CW. Effect of fracture gap on stability of compression plate fixation: a finite element study. J Orthop Res. 2010 Apr; 28(4): 462-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20990