Virtual Screening of Kinase Based Drugs: Statistical Learning Towards Drug Repositioning

Authors

  • M.T. Mustapha Department of Mathematics, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
  • D.R. Flower School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
  • A.K. Chattopadhyay Department of Mathematics, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8792.2022.08.03%20

Keywords:

Statistical Modelling, Molecular Docking, Consensus Scoring, Virtual Screening, Multiple linear regressions

Abstract

Kinases are phosphate catalysing enzymes that have traditionally proved difficult to target against ligands,
and hence inefficacious in drug development. There are two colluding reasons for this. First is the issue of specificity.
The homogeneity that exists between the kinase ATP-binding pockets makes it a non-realisable target to develop
compounds that would inhibit only one out of 538 protein kinases encoded by the human genome, without inhibiting
some of the others. Second, producing compounds with the required efficacy to rival the millimolar ATP concentrations
present in cells is stoichiometrically inefficient. This study uses a recently propounded computational strategy based on
Structure Based Virtual Screening (SBVS) that was previously benchmarked on 999 DUD-E protein decoys
(Chattopadhyay et al, Int Sc. Comp. Life Sciences 2022), to rank potential ligands, or by extension rank kinase-ligand
pairs, identifying best matching ligand:kinase docking pairs. The results of the SBVS campaign employing several
computational algorithms reveal variations in the preferred top hits. To address this, we introduce a novel consensus
scoring algorithm by sampling statistics across four independent statistical universality classes, statistically combining
docking scores from ten docking programs (DOCK, Quick Vina-W, Vina Carb, PLANTS, Autodock, QuickVina2,
QuickVina21, Smina, Autodock Vina and VinaXB) to create a holistic SBVS formulation that can identify active ligands
for any target. Our results demonstrate that CS provides improved ligand:kinase docking fidelity when compared to
individual docking platforms, requiring only a small number of docking combinations, and can serve as a viable and
thrifty alternative to expensive docking platforms.

References

Chong, A. and Lopez-de-Silanes, F., 2005. Privatization in Latin America: Myths and Reality. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-5882-5

Ciociola, A.A., Cohen, L.B. and Kulkarni, P., 2014. the F.-RMC of the AC of Gastroenterology. How drugs are developed and approved by the FDA: current process and future directions, Am J Gastroenterol, 109, pp.620-623. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2013.407

Dickson, M. and Gagnon, J.P., 2004. Key factors in the rising cost of new drug discovery and development. Nature reviews Drug discovery, 3(5), pp.417-429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1382

Kneller, R., 2003. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 867; [CrossRef] [PubMed] b) DiMasi, JA; Hansen, RW; Grabowski. J. Health Econ, 22, p.151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00126-1

Ekins, S., Williams, A.J., Krasowski, M.D. and Freundlich, J.S., 2011. In silico repositioning of approved drugs for rare and neglected diseases. Drug discovery today, 16(7-8), pp.298-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2011.02.016

Cavalla, D., 2013. Predictive methods in drug repurposing: gold mine or just a bigger haystack?. Drug discovery today, 18(11-12), pp.523-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2012.12.009

Gupta, S.C., Sung, B., Prasad, S., Webb, L.J. and Aggarwal, B.B., 2013. Cancer drug discovery by repurposing: teaching new tricks to old dogs. Trends in pharmacological sciences, 34(9), pp.508-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2013.06.005

Hodos, R.A., Kidd, B.A., Shameer, K., Readhead, B.P. and Dudley, J.T., 2016. In silico methods for drug repurposing and pharmacology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine, 8(3), pp.186-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1337

Liu, Z., Fang, H., Reagan, K., Xu, X., Mendrick, D.L., Slikker Jr, W. and Tong, W., 2013. In silico drug repositioning–what we need to know. Drug discovery today, 18(3-4), pp.110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2012.08.005

Kitchen, D.B., Decornez, H., Furr, J.R. and Bajorath, J., 2004. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nature reviews Drug discovery, 3(11), pp.935-949. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1549

Sliwoski, G., Kothiwale, S., Meiler, J. and Lowe, E.W., 2014. Computational methods in drug discovery. Pharmacological reviews, 66(1), pp.334-395. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007336

Anderson, A.C., 2003. The process of structure-based drug design. Chemistry & biology, 10(9), pp.787-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.09.002

Lounnas, V., Ritschel, T., Kelder, J., McGuire, R., Bywater, R.P. and Foloppe, N., 2013. Current progress in structure-based rational drug design marks a new mindset in drug discovery. Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 5(6), p.e201302011. https://doi.org/10.5936/csbj.201302011

Kaul PN (1998) Drug discovery: past, present and future. Prog Drug Res 50: 9-105 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8833-2_1

Mandal S, Moudgil M, Mandal SK (2009) Rational drug design. Eur J Pharmacol 625 (1-3): 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.06.065

Mavromoustakos, T., 2011. Editorial [Hot Topic: Methodologies and applied strategies in the rational drug design (Guest Editor: T. Mavromoustakos)]. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 18(17), pp.2516-2516. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986711795933650

Wang, T., Wu, M.B., Zhang, R.H., Chen, Z.J., Hua, C., Lin, J.P. and Yang, L.R., 2016. Advances in computational structure-based drug design and application in drug discovery. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 16(9), pp.901-916. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026615666150825142002

Reise, S.P. and Waller, N.G., 2009. Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual review of clinical psychology, 5(1), pp.27-48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553

Gibbons, D.L., Pricl, S., Posocco, P., Laurini, E., Fermeglia, M., Sun, H., Talpaz, M., Donato, N. and Quintás-Cardama, A., 2014. Molecular dynamics reveal BCR-ABL1 polymutants as a unique mechanism of resistance to PAN-BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibitor therapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), pp.3550-3555. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321173111

Rester, U., 2008. From virtuality to reality-Virtual screening in lead discovery and lead optimization: a medicinal chemistry perspective. Current opinion in drug discovery & development, 11(4), pp.559-568.

Abedini, F., Ebrahimi, M., Roozbehani, A. and Domb, A. J., 2018. Overview on Natural Hydrophilic Polysaccharide Polymers in Drug Delivery. Polymers For Advanced Technologies 29, 2564-2573. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4375

Mottaghitalab, F., et al., 2015. Silk fibrin nanoparticles as novel drug delivery systems. Journal of Controlled Release 206, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.020

Hosseinkhani, H., 2022. Developing 3D Technology for Drug Discovery. Current Drug Delivery 19, 813-814. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567201819666220126163444

Hosseinkhani, H., 2019. Nanomaterials in Advanced Medicine. John Wiley & Sons, ISBN: 9783527345496. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527818921

Persidis, A., 1998. High-throughput screening. Nature biotechnology, 16(5), pp.488-489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0598-488

Wilkinson, G.F. and Pritchard, K., 2015. In vitro screening for drug repositioning. Journal of biomolecular screening, 20(2), pp.167-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057114563024

Rollinger, J.M., Stuppner, H. and Langer, T., 2008. Virtual screening for the discovery of bioactive natural products. Natural compounds as drugs Volume I, pp.211-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8117-2_6

Shoichet, B.K., 2004. Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature, 432(7019), pp.862-865. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03197

Bajorath, J., 2002. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 1(11), pp.882-894. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd941

Jenkins, J.L., Kao, R.Y. and Shapiro, R., 2003. Virtual screening to enrich hit lists from high-throughput screening: A case study on small-molecule inhibitors of angiogenin. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 50(1), pp.81-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.10270

McInnes, C., 2007. Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery. Current opinion in chemical biology, 11(5), pp.494-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.08.033

Wu, P., Nielsen, T.E. and Clausen, M.H., 2015. FDA-approved small-molecule kinase inhibitors. Trends in pharmacological sciences, 36(7), pp.422-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2015.04.005

刘杰 and 王任小, 2015. Classification of Current Scoring Functions. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500731a

Huang, S.Y., Grinter, S.Z. and Zou, X., 2010. Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein–ligand docking: recent advances and future directions. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 12(40), pp.12899-12908. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp00151a

Jain, A.N., 2006. Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking. Current Protein and Peptide Science, 7(5), pp.407-420. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920306778559395

Karchin, R., Cline, M. and Karplus, K., 2004. Evaluation of local structure alphabets based on residue burial. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 55(3), pp.508-518. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20008

Neudert, G. and Klebe, G., 2011. DSX: a knowledge-based scoring function for the assessment of protein–ligand complexes. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 51(10), pp.2731-2745. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200274q

Krammer, A., Kirchhoff, P.D., Jiang, X., Venkatachalam, C.M. and Waldman, M., 2005. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 23(5), pp.395-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2004.11.007

Vickers, N.J., 2017. Animal communication: when i’m calling you, will you answer too?. Current biology, 27(14), pp.R713-R715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.064

Meng, E.C., Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., 1992. Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. Journal of computational chemistry, 13(4), pp.505-524. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540130412

Kramer, B., Rarey, M. and Lengauer, T., 1999. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein–ligand docking. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 37(2), pp.228-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19991101)37:2<22 8::AID-PROT8>3.0.CO;2-8

Eldridge, M.D., Murray, C.W., Auton, T.R., Paolini, G.V. and Mee, R.P., 1997. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 11(5), pp.425-445. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007996124545

Kadukova, M. and Grudinin, S., 2017. Convex-PL: a novel knowledge-based potential for protein-ligand interactions deduced from structural databases using convex optimization. Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 31(10), pp.943-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-017-0068-8

Muegge, I. and Martin, Y.C., 1999. A general and fast scoring function for protein- ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 42(5), pp.791-804. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm980536j

Ma, D.L., Chan, D.S.H. and Leung, C.H., 2013. Drug repositioning by structure-based virtual screening. Chemical Society Reviews, 42(5), pp.2130-2141. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35357a

Cheng, T., Li, Q., Zhou, Z., Wang, Y. and Bryant, S.H., 2012. Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review. The AAPS journal, 14(1), pp.133-141. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-012-9322-0

Charifson, P.S., Corkery, J.J., Murcko, M.A. and Walters, W.P., 1999. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 42(25), pp.5100-5109. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm990352k

Wang, R. and Wang, S., 2001. How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experiment. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 41(5), pp.1422-1426. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci010025x

Clark, R.D., Strizhev, A., Leonard, J.M., Blake, J.F. and Matthew, J.B., 2002. Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 20(4), pp.281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00125-5

Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T.N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I.N. and Bourne, P.E., 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic acids research, 28(1), pp.235-242. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235

Petrescu, I., Lamotte-Brasseur, J., Chessa, J.P., Ntarima, P., Claeyssens, M., Devreese, B., Marino, G. and Gerday, C., 2000. Xylanase from the psychrophilic yeast Cryptococcus adeliae. Extremophiles, 4(3), pp.137-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007920070028

Toseland, C.P., McSparron, H., Davies, M.N. and Flower, D.R., 2006. PPD v1. 0—an integrated, web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein p K a values. Nucleic acids research, 34(suppl_1), pp. D199-D203. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj035

Hummell, N.A., Revtovich, A.V. and Kirienko, N.V., 2021. Novel immune modulators enhance Caenorhabditis elegans Resistance to Multiple Pathogens. Msphere, 6(1), pp. e00950-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00950-20

N.-P. Do, S. Chattopadhyay, D R Flower and A. K. Chattopadhyay, 2022. Towards Effective Consensus Scoring in Structure-Based Virtual Screening. Interdisciplinary Science: Computational Life Sciences. (accepted)

Basu, S., Ramaiah, S. and Anbarasu, A., 2021. In-silico strategies to combat COVID-19: A comprehensive review. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 37(1), pp.64-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2021.1966920

Lahiri, A., Jha, S.S., Bhattacharya, S., Ray, S. and Chakraborty, A., 2020. Effectiveness of preventive measures against COVID-19: A systematic review of In Silico modeling studies in Indian context. Indian journal of public health, 64(6), p.156. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.IJPH_464_20

Drobysh, M., Ramanaviciene, A., Viter, R. and Ramanavicius, A., 2021. Affinity sensors for the Diagnosis of Covid-19. Micromachines 12(4), 390; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12040390

Downloads

Published

2022-12-12

How to Cite

Mustapha, M. ., Flower, D., & Chattopadhyay, A. . (2022). Virtual Screening of Kinase Based Drugs: Statistical Learning Towards Drug Repositioning. Journal of Nanotechnology in Diagnosis and Treatment, 8, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8792.2022.08.03

Issue

Section

Articles