The Thermal Emission Toxicity and Qualitative Screening of Volatile Organic Emissions and Hazard Identification from Water Hyacinth Fiber–Cassava Starch Biodegradable Composites
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8717.2026.14.14Keywords:
Biodegradable packaging, Cassava starch matrix, Food contact safety, GC-MS emission analysis, Qualitative hazard screening, Tentative compound identification, Volatile toxicity, Water hyacinth compositesAbstract
The rapid transition toward sustainable packaging has driven the development of biodegradable polymer composites utilizing agricultural wastes, such as water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) fibers and cassava starch matrices. However, while the environmental biodegradability of such biocomposites is widely studied, the toxicological safety of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released under thermal exposure remains critically unaddressed. This study evaluated the volatile emission profile and qualitative hazard screening of water hyacinth–cassava starch composite sheets subjected to heat (100 °C for 15 min) simulating hot-food contact conditions. Using Headspace Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (HS-GC-MS), 26 volatile compounds were tentatively identified based on NIST library mass spectral matching (similarity match factor >80%, corresponding to Metabolomics Standards Initiative Level 2). The identified profile included 9 hazardous chemical species classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Key hazardous emissions comprised Group 1 human carcinogens (Ethylene oxide 3.60% peak area and Formaldehyde [5.80%]), Group 2A/2B probable/possible carcinogens (Ethylenimine 19.40%, Acetaldehyde 10.50%, Trichloromethane 1.20%, Tetrachloromethane 0.90%, 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.70%, and 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.60%), alongside hepatotoxic Chloromethane (17.10%). It is emphasized that reported peak area percentages represent relative chromatographic abundances under specific headspace thermal desorption conditions and do not reflect absolute mass concentrations. Furthermore, qualitative hazard identification does not constitute a quantitative health risk assessment, as consumer exposure levels and migration limits were not established. The origin of these hazardous species stems from a plausible combination of aquatic bioaccumulation by raw water hyacinth, alkali delignification pre-treatment residuals, thermal fragmentation of the starch–glycerol matrix, and pyrolysis of residual plant proteinaceous biomass. These findings demonstrate that environmental biodegradability does not inherently ensure chemical safety for food contact materials, highlighting the necessity of integrating volatile emission toxicity screening into biopolymer safety standards.
References
Rajendran S, Al-Samydai A, Palani G, Trilaksana H, Sathish T, Giri J, et al. Replacement of petroleum-based products with plant-based materials, green and sustainable energy—a review. Engineering Reports. 2025;7(4):e70108. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70108
Mafe AN, Edo GI, Ali AB, Akpoghelie PO, Yousif E, Isoje EF, et al. Next-generation biopolymers for sustainable food packaging: Innovations in material science, circular economy, and smart technologies. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2025;18(11):9052-9108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-025-04011-4
Pattnaik SS, Behera D, Nanda D, Das N, Behera AK. Green chemistry approaches in materials science: physico-mechanical properties and sustainable applications of grass fiber-reinforced composites. Green Chemistry. 2025;27(10):2629-2660. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4GC05569A
Abdel Kader AH, Fahmy TY, Kamel S. Lignocellulosic reinforced composites: a snapshot of progress. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology. 2025;45(4):167-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2025.2538620
Subramani R, Sekhar K, Dwivedi JN, Reddy Maddike R, Venkateswarlu V, Kumar AP. Explainable AI for Structure–Property Analysis of FDM-Printed Biodegradable Polymer Nanocomposites. Journal of Composites and Biodegradable Polymers. 2025;13:202–209.. https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8717.2025.13.17
Saning A, Herou S, Dechtrirat D, Ieosakulrat C, Pakawatpanurut P, Kaowphong S, et al. Green and sustainable zero-waste conversion of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) into superior magnetic carbon composite adsorbents and supercapacitor electrodes. RSC Adv. 2019;9(42):24248-24258. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA03873F
Adak A, Singh S, Lavanya AK, Sharma A, Nain L. Sustainable production of biofuels from weedy biomass and other unconventional lignocellulose wastes. In: Sustainable biotechnology-enzymatic resources of renewable energy. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 83-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95480-6_4
Cherwoo L, Kumar S, Das S, Datta A, Verma S, Prabhu NG, et al. Transforming aquatic weeds into resources: Pontederia crassipes, water hyacinth mining for circular bioeconomy. Environ Manage. 2025;75(9):2458-2478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02225-y .
Lebepe J, Buthelezi NM, Manganyi MC. Occurrence and control of microplastics and emerging technological solutions for their removal in freshwaters: a comprehensive review. Microplastics. 2025;4(4):70.. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics4040070
Akinnawo SO. Advance nanocomposites from biopolymers and fillers: sources, characterization, and end-use applications. Polymer-Plastics Technol Mater. 2024;63(5):570-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/25740881.2023.2296659
Ninh PTT, Choe S, Cho Y, Moon H, Myung J. All-water-based fabrication of biodegradable mulch films from dead leaves via complex hydrogen-bonded networks. Green Chem. 2026;28(10):4449-4465. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5GC06616F
Shi X, Cui L, Xu C, Wu S. Next-generation bioplastics for food packaging: Sustainable materials and applications. Materials. 2025;18(12):2919. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122919
Negru I, Mogas-Soldevila L, Sănduleanu C, Cojocaru G. Ecological Tensions in Soil: Healthier Biopolymeric Solutions in Urban and Agricultural Land. Appl Sci. 2026;16(9):4547. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16094547
Liu YQ, Wang ZW, Hu CY. Progress in research on the safety of silicone rubber products in food processing. Comprehensive Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2023;22(4):2887-2909. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.13165
Carlos AK, Manalo GJ, Encarnacion EKP, Del Rosario AF, Mendoza JAT, Alcantara AC, et al. Profiling of Total Residual Contaminants Migrating from Philippine-Based Polyethylene Packaging to Fermented and Alcoholic Foods. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci. 2026;14(1):460. https://doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.14.1.32
Withana PA, Yuan X, Im D, Choi Y, Bank MS, Lin CSK, et al. Biodegradable plastics in soils: sources, degradation, and effects. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2025;27(11):3321-3343. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EM00754A
Singh S, Habib M, Sekhar S, Kumar Y, Bashir K, Jan S, et al. A comprehensive overview of the properties, applications, advancements, and safety of biodegradable packaging films. Discover Chem Eng. 2026;6(1):[H]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-026-00137-9
Versino F, Ortega F, Monroy Y, Rivero S, López OV, García MA. Sustainable and bio-based food packaging: A review on past and current design innovations. Foods. 2023;12(5):1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12051057
Amobonye A. Bibliometric, patent, and systematic review of waste-derived biopolymers and natural functional agents in active and intelligent packaging. Discover Polymers. 2026;3(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44347-026-00058-4
Falua KJ, Pokharel A, Babaei-Ghazvini A, Ai Y, Acharya B. Valorization of starch to biobased materials: A review. Polymers. 2022;14(11):2215. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112215
Gupta RK, Pipliya S, Karunanithi S, Eswaran U GM, Kumar S, Mandliya S, et al. Migration of chemical compounds from packaging materials into packaged foods: Interaction, mechanism, assessment, and regulations. Foods. 2024;13(19):3125.. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13193125
Henry BJ, Carlin JP, Hammerschmidt JA, Buck RC, Buxton LW, Fiedler H, et al. A critical review of the application of polymer of low concern and regulatory criteria to fluoropolymers. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018;14(3):316-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4035
Etxabide A, Young B, Bremer PJ, Kilmartin PA. Non-permanent primary food packaging materials assessment: Identification, migration, toxicity, and consumption of substances. Comprehensive Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2022;21(5):4130-4145.https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.13001
Culleré L, Sangüesa E, Lomba L, Ribate MP, Zuriaga E, García CB. A Systematic review: migration of chemical compounds from plastic material containers in food and pharmaceutical fields. J Xenobiotics. 2025;15(6):194. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15060194
Madikizela LM. Removal of organic pollutants in water using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Environ Manage. 2021;295:113153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113153
Tumembouw SS, Pangkey H, Kusen DJ. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) as a phytoremediator for organochlorine pollutants in Lake Tondano. AACL Bioflux. 2024;17(4):1388-1395.. http://www.bioflux.com.ro/aacl.
Hubbe MA, Szlek DB, Vera RE. Detergency Mechanisms and Cellulosic Surfaces: A Review. BioResources. 2022;17(4):1. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.18.1.1-3
Bulu YI. Limiting Sediment Phosphorus Recruitment to Mitigate Water Hyacinth (Pontederia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) Invasion of Aquatic Ecological Systems. J Appl Sci Environ Manage. 2026;30(4):1280. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v30i4.26
Saravanan K, Rajendran M, Kathirvel P. Utilization of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) as a feasible substrate for the production of single cell protein using saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker’s yeast). Waste Biomass Valorization. 2023;14(12):4231-4242.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02138-z
Adelodun AA, Hassan UO, Nwachuckwu VO. Environmental, mechanical, and biochemical benefits of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27(24):30210-30221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09221-1
Adly HM, Saati AA, Obaid MS, Saleh SA. Chemical Migration of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Other Compounds from Plastic Food Packaging: Assessment of Food Safety Risks and Health Impacts. Foods. 2025;14(6):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14061013
Ong HT, Samsudin H, Soto-Valdez H. Migration of endocrine-disrupting chemicals into food from plastic packaging materials: an overview of chemical risk assessment, techniques to monitor migration, and international regulations. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(4):957-979. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1830747
Jaiswal S, Moreb NA, Jaiswal AK. Regulatory, ethical, and standardization aspects of smart and intelligent food packaging. In: Smart and Intelligent Food Packaging. Academic Press; 2026. p. 485-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-24724-8.00019-3
